🚀 Try Zilliz Cloud, the fully managed Milvus, for free—experience 10x faster performance! Try Now>>

Milvus
Zilliz
  • Home
  • AI Reference
  • What are the most commonly used vector databases for surveillance?

What are the most commonly used vector databases for surveillance?

Vector databases are critical for surveillance systems that rely on similarity searches, such as facial recognition, object tracking, or anomaly detection. The most widely used options include Milvus, FAISS, Elasticsearch with k-NN, Pinecone, and Qdrant. These databases excel at storing and querying high-dimensional vector data, which is essential for tasks like matching surveillance footage against known patterns or identities. For example, Milvus is designed for scalability, making it suitable for real-time video analysis, while FAISS optimizes search speed for large datasets. Each tool has trade-offs in performance, ease of use, and integration with existing infrastructure.

Milvus is a popular open-source vector database built for high-throughput applications. It supports distributed deployments, allowing surveillance systems to scale horizontally as data volumes grow. For instance, a city-wide camera network could use Milvus to index faces or license plates in real time. Its flexible indexing algorithms (e.g., HNSW, IVF) balance speed and accuracy, which is crucial for time-sensitive surveillance workflows. FAISS, developed by Meta, is a library optimized for GPU-accelerated similarity searches. While not a full database, it’s often integrated into custom surveillance pipelines for tasks like clustering suspicious activities in archived footage. Elasticsearch’s k-NN plugin extends its search capabilities to vectors, enabling hybrid queries that combine metadata (e.g., timestamps, locations) with vector similarity. This is useful for forensic analysis, such as finding all vehicles near a crime scene that match a specific color and shape.

Pinecone offers a managed service, reducing operational overhead for teams deploying surveillance applications. Its serverless architecture automatically handles indexing and scaling, which is advantageous for cloud-based systems. Qdrant, another open-source option, emphasizes performance and flexibility, supporting exact and approximate search methods. For example, a surveillance system using Qdrant could prioritize low-latency queries during live monitoring while running deeper analyses offline. When choosing a database, developers should consider factors like latency requirements (real-time vs. batch processing), hardware constraints (GPU support), and integration with machine learning frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch). Tools like Milvus and Pinecone provide client libraries for seamless embedding integration, while FAISS requires more manual implementation but offers fine-grained control.

Like the article? Spread the word